Abstract
Abstract
Background/Aim. Trabeculectomy is a safe procedure which effectively reduces the intraocular pressure (IOP). IOP is the most frequent indicator of success after glaucoma surgery. The aim of this work was to evaluate the long-term pressure control in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (XFG) after primary trabeculectomy without the use of mitomycin-C (MMC), 3 to 5 years after trabeculectomy. Methods. This study involved a retrospective evaluation of 332 consecutive patients (352 eyes), 174 patients (188 eyes) with POAG (mean age of 64.0 ± 8.6 years) and 158 patients (164 eyes) with XFG (mean age of 70.7 ± 8.9 years) who underwent primary trabeculectomy between January 2007 and December 2009 at the Clinic for Eye Diseases, Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade. A successful control of IOP was defined as achieving IOP ≤ 21 mmHg without medication (complete success), or with a single topical medication (qualified success). Results. According to the type of glaucoma POAG/XFG preoperative IOP was 28.4 ± 6.3/30.4 ± 8.4 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.311) and last postoperative IOP was 16.9 ± 5.2/18.7 ± 5.9 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.681). According to the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, the complete success in the group with POAG in 1, 3 and 5 years were 85%, 75% and 58% and in the group with XFG were 82%, 70% and 56%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the complete success rates between the patients with POAG and XFG. Conclusion. The primary goal of surgery was to achieve a sufficiently low IOP without additional medication, thus preventing progression of glaucomatous damage. In our study, the complete success in the group with POAG was achieved in 75% and 58% of the patientsin the period of 3 and 5 years after surgery, respectively and in the group with XFG complete success was achieved in 70% and 56% of the patients respectively.
Keywords
exfoliation syndrome
trabeculectomy
intraocular pressure
treatment outcome
References
REFERENCES
Buys YM, Chipman ML, Zack B, Rootman DS, Slomovic AR, Trope GE. Prospective randomized comparison of one- versus two-site Phacotrabeculectomy two-year results. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(7): 1130–3.e1.
Shaarawy T, Flammer J, Haefliger IO. Reducing intraocular pres-sure: Is surgery better than drugs?. Eye (Lond) 2004; 18(12): 1215–24.
Chen G, Li W, Jiang F, Mao S, Tong Y. Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy in Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials. PLoS One 2014; 9(1): e86045.
Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new me-thod. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 66(4): 673–9.
Rao K, Ahmed I, Blake DA, Ayyala RS. New devices in glau-coma surgery. Expert Revi Ophthalmol 2009; 4(5): 491–504.
He M, Wang W, Zhang X, Huang W. Ologen implant versus Mi¬tomycin C for trabeculectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9(1): e85782.
Fernández S, Pardiñas N, Laliena JL, Pablo L, Díaz S, Pérez S, et al. Long-term tensional results after trabeculectomy. A com-parative study among types of glaucoma and previous medical treatment. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2009; 84(7): 345–51. (Spanish)
Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P. A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: Risk factors and out-comes. Ophthalmology 2012; 119(4): 694–702.
Bevin TH, Molteno AC, Herbison P. Otago Glaucoma Surgery Out¬come Study: Long-term results of 841 trabeculectomies. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2008; 36(8): 731–7.
Jordan JF, Wecker T, Oterendorp C, Anton A, Reinhard T, Boehringer D,et al. Trabectome surgery for primary and secondary open angle glaucomas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251(12): 2753–60.
Parc CE, Johnson DH, Oliver JE, Hattenhauer MG, Hodge DO. The long-term outcome of glaucoma filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 132(1): 27–35.
Mills KB. Trabeculectomy: A retrospective long-term follow-up of 444 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 1981; 65(11): 790–5.
Watson PG, Grierson I. The place of trabeculectomy in the treatment of glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1981; 88(3): 175–96.
Nouri-Mahdavi K, Brigatti L, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Outcomes of trabeculectomy for primary open-angle glaucoma. Oph-thalmology 1995; 102(12): 1760–9.
Khalili MA, Diestelhorst M, Krieglstein GK. Long-term follow-up of 700 trabeculectomies. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2000; 217(1): 1–8; discussion 9. (German)
Ehrnrooth P, Lehto I, Puska P, Laatikainen L. Long-term out-come of trabeculectomy in terms of intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002; 80(3): 267–71.
European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 3rd ed. Italy, Savona: Editrice DOGMA; 2008. p. 155–6.
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90(3): 262–7.
Razeghinejad MR, Fudemberg SJ, Spaeth GL. The changing con-ceptual basis of trabeculectomy: A review of past and current surgical techniques. Surv Ophthalmol 2012; 57(1): 1–25.
Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, Lichter PR, Varma R. CIGTS Study Group. Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treat-ment Study. Ophthalmology 2011; 118(9): 1766–73.
Cvetkovic D, Blagojevic M, Dodic V. Experience with trepanotra-beculectomy. ActaOphthalmol (Copenh) 1978; 56(1):150–60.
Palmberg P. How clinical trial results are changing our thinking about target pressures. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2002; 13(2): 85–8.
Molteno AC, Bevin TH, Herbison P, Husni MA. Long-term re-sults of primary trabeculectomies and Molteno implants for primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129(11): 1444–50.
Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. II. Variations in operative technique and outcome. Eye (Lond) 2001; 15(Pt 4): 441–8.
Law SK, Shih K, Tran DH, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Long-term outcomes of repeat vs initial trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 148(5): 685–95. e1.
Casson R, Rahman R, Salmon JF. Long term results and compli-cations of trabeculectomy augmented with low dose mitomy-cin C in patients at risk for filtration failure. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85(6): 686–8.
Diestelhorst M, Khalili MA, Krieglstein GK.Trabeculectomy: A retrospective follow-up of 700 eyes. Int Ophthalmol 1998–1999; 22(4): 211–20.
Molteno AC, Bosma NJ, Kittelson JM. Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study: Long-term results of trabeculectomy: 1976 to 1995. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(9): 1742–50.
Tornqvist G, Drolsum LK. Trabeculectomies: A long-term study. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1991; 69(4): 450–4.
Popovic V, Sjöstrand J. Long term outcome following trabecu-lectomy: I Retrospective analysis of intraocular pressure regu-lation and cataract formation. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1991; 69(3): 299–304.
Watson PG, Jakeman C, Ozturk M, Barnett MF, Barnett F, Khaw KT. The complications of trabeculectomy: A 20-year follow-up. Eye 1990; 4(Pt 3): 425–38.
Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye (Lond) 2002; 16(3): 297–303.
Serguhn S, Spiegel D. Comparison of postoperative recovery af-ter trabeculectomy for pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and chron-ic primary open angle glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1999; 215(5): 281–6. (German)
Mietz H, Raschka B, Krieglstein GK. Risk factors for failures of trabeculectomies performed without antimetabolites. Br J Ophthalmol 1999; 83(7): 814–21.