Abstract
Seven decades ago, Samuel P. Huntington proposed a theory of civil-military relations, the foundation of which are the professional military ethics of officers, which are typically conservative in their principles and values. It simultaneously allows officers to practice their profession (which is in direct contact with politics), command the army (which is one of the institutions of the political system), and participate in the execution of tasks (which are part of the war effort or preparations for war, the essence of which is political). Since then, the dominant social values have changed significantly, especially after the collapse of the USSR and the dominance of neoliberal capitalism. The armies of numerous European states have been reformed. The important question is whether the values of the officer profession have changed and liberalized in order to align with dominant social values or whether Huntington’s conservative military mind is resisting the challenges of the times.
In this paper, the vitality of Huntington’s theoretical explanation of officer professionalism is proven by empirical research on the attitudes of cadets of the Military Academy in Belgrade, which indicate their conservatism. The cadets’ attitudes are aligned with the traditional values of the army and its social role. At the same time, they are in contradiction with the dominant social values of fluid modernity.
The research results show a homogeneity of the cadets’ responses, which are largely unaffected by their socio-demographic characteristics. They also point to one truth: the officer profession mainly attracts young people with a conservative attitude. This may perhaps explain some of the problems in attracting more young people to enroll in military schools and serve in the military, which almost all armies in Europe are facing today.
Keywords
military mind
values
conservativism
cadets of Military academy
References
Alargić, Dragana. 2012. Karakteristike pojedinca kao činioci vrednosti pripadnika Vojske Srbije. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet Univerzitet u Beogradu.
Bauman, Zigmunt. 2007. Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Zigmunt. 2009. Fluidni život. Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.
Finer, Samuel E. 2002. The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. New Jersey: Transaction Publisher.
Hantington, Semjuel P. 2004a. Vojnik i država: teorija i politika civilno-vojnih odnosa. Beograd: Prometej, Fakultet političkih nauka Univerziteta u Beograd i Diplomatska akademija Ministarstva spoljnih poslova SCG.
Hantington, Semjuel P. 2004b. Treći talas: demokratizacija na kraju dvadesetog veka. Beograd: Stubovi kulture.
Havelka, Nenad. 1995. „Vrednosne orijentacije učenika i njihova očekivanja od budućeg zanimanja”. Psihološka istraživanja 7: 89–125.
Hejvud, Edru. 2004. Politika. Beograd: Clio.
Janowitz, Morris. 1959. Sociology and the Military Establishment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Janowitz, Morris. 1960. The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait. New York: Free Press.
Kastels, Manuel. 2018. Uspon umreženog društva. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
Mahoney-Norris, Katheleen A. 2001. Huntington Revisited: Is Conservative Realism Still Essential for the Military Ethic? Washington DC: National War College.
Molnar, Dejan, i Maja Jandrić. 2019. „Unutarregionalne nejednakosti u Srbiji”. Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke 169 (1): 91–108.
Nuciari, Marina. 2018. “Participation and Change in Gendered Organisations. Women in the Military Forces”. In Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, Second Edition, eds. Giuseppe Caforio and Marina Nuciari, 301–325. Cham: Springer.
Orlović, Slaviša. 2016. „Socijaldemokratija – stare vrednosti u novom kontekstu”. U Socijalna demokratija u Evropi i koncept „dobrog društva”, prir. Slaviša Orlović, 35–46. Beograd: Fondacija Fridrih Ebert.
Pavlović, Todor. 1909. Društveni razvitak i vojska (evolucija vojne discipline). Beograd: Nova štamparija „Davidović”.
Pešić, Anita, i Jasmina Milošević Stolić. 2025. „Vaspitno-obrazovni proces u Vojnoj akademiji kao faktor formiranja vrednosnog sistema budućih oficira”. Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 29 (2): 69–95. DOI: 10.5937/pnb29-58425.
Sartori, Đovani. 2001. Demokratija – šta je to? Podgorica: CID.
Sims, William S. 1922. “Military Conservativism”. U. S. Naval Institute Proceedings 48 (229): 347–364.
Stanar, Dragan. 2024. “A Problem in the Huntingtonian Universe: The Military Side of the Gap”. Armed Forces & Society 54 (1): 1–20. DOI: 10.1177/0095327X241254354.
Stanar, Dragan. 2025. „Vrednosni jaz i borbeni moral: vrednosti koje se žive vs. vrednosti koje se brane”. Politička revija 85 (1): 187–206. DOI: 10.5937/pr85-60853.
Starčević, Srđan, i Srđan Blagojević. 2022. „Profesionalna vojska u neutralnim državama i društvena potreba za zaštitom”. U Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje, ur. Veljko Blagojević, 209–227. Beograd: Medija centar „Odbrana”.
Starčević, Srđan, i Srđan Blagojević. 2023. „Služenje vojnog roka kao deo društvenog ideala u Srbiji”. Srpska politička misao 80 (2): 33–51. DOI: 10.5937/spm80-44254.
Starčević, Srđan. 2010. „Pretorijanski problem u savremenoj politikologiji”. Vojno delo 62 (4): 193–209.
Starčević, Srđan. 2024. „Povratak obaveznog služenja vojnog roka u Evropi – društveni determinizam i perspektive”. Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 26 (1): 11–26. DOI: 10.5937/pnb26-50140.
Stojiljković, Zoran. 2016. „Marginalije o sreći i jednakosti”. U Socijalna demokratija u Evropi i koncept „dobrog društva”, prir. Slaviša Orlović, 47–61. Beograd: Fondacija Fridrih Ebert.
Tagarev, Todor D. 1997. The Role of Military Education in Harmonizying Civil-Military Relations (the Bulgarian Case). NATO Democratic Institutions Individual Fellowship Project, Final Report, June, https://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/95-97/tagarev.pdf.
Vjatr, Ježi. 1987. Sociologija vojske. Beograd: Vojnoizdavački i novinski centar.
Zaretti, Alessia. 2018. “Lesbian Gay Bi-sexual Transgender (LGBT) Personnel: A Military Challenge”. In Handbook of the Sociology of the Military, Second Edition, eds. Giuseppe Caforio and Marina Nuciari, 391–404. Cham: Springer.