Primena sistema unutrašnjeg fiksatora za prednji prsten karlice uz istovremenu unutrašnju fiksaciju zadnjeg prstena karlice sakroilijačnim zavrtnjem kod nestabilnih preloma karlice tipa C po Tile-u
Scindeks Asistent Scindeks Asistent — Sistem za uređivanje časopisa
PDF (engleski)

Kako citirati

1.
Liu Z, Zou G. Primena sistema unutrašnjeg fiksatora za prednji prsten karlice uz istovremenu unutrašnju fiksaciju zadnjeg prstena karlice sakroilijačnim zavrtnjem kod nestabilnih preloma karlice tipa C po Tile-u. Vojnosanit Pregl [Internet]. 30. Avgust 2024. [citirano 12. Juli 2026.];81(08). Dostupno na: https://asistent.ceon.rs/index.php/vsp/article/view/50120

Sažetak

Uvod/Cilj. Broj slučajeva povrede karlice je u porastu na globalnom nivou, najviše zbog saobraćajnih nezgoda, ali i zbog sve većeg broja sportsko-rekreativnih povreda. Nestabilna povreda karlice tipa C po Tile-u (Tile C-type unstable pelvic trauma-TCUPT) je povreda koja se dešava tokom saobraćajnih nezgoda ili prilikom pada sa velike visine. Cilj rada bio je da se ispita primena sistema unutrašnje fiksacije (internal fixation-INFIX) za prednji karlični prsten (anterior pelvic ring-APR) uz istovremenu primenu INFIX zadnjeg karličnog prstena (posterior pelvic ring-PPR) primenom sakroilijačnog zavrtnja (sacroiliac screw-SS) (INFIX PPR SS) kod TCUPT. Metode. Ispitanici (ukupno 89) selektovani su među bolesnicima sa TCUPT u periodu od decembra 2020. do decembra 2023. godine. Izvršena je retrospektivna analiza podataka ispitanika, nakon čega su ispitanici podeljeni na dve grupe na osnovu različitih terapijskih protokola kojima su podvrgnuti: grupa A (INFIX sistem za APR + INFIX PPR SS, n = 46) i grupa B (spoljni fiksator za APR + INFIX PPR SS, n = 43). Rezultati. U poređenju sa grupom B, grupa A imala je kraće vreme: do početka prve aktivnosti nakon operacije, zarastanja preloma i oporavka funkcije zgloba, kao i kraću dužinu boravka u bolnici (t = 6,623, 4,796, 7,992 i 5,227, redom, < 0,05). Nije bilo značajne razlike između dve grupe po pitanju dužine trajanja operacije i obima krvarenja (t = 1,433, 1,123, redom, > 0,05). Rezultati redukcije preloma bili su bolji u grupi A nego u grupi B (Z = 2,058, < 0,05). Stopa incidencije komplikacija bila je niža u grupi A nego u grupi B (2,17% vs. 18,60%) (χ2 = 4,917; < 0,05). Zaključak. Kod bolesnika sa TCUPT, primenom INFIX sistema za APR sa istovremenom primenom INFIX PRR SS, postižu se dobri rezultati redukcije preloma.

Ključne reči

zavrtnji za kost; prelomi;
prelomi, fiksacija, unutrašnja;
prelom, otvorena redukcija;
karlične kosti;
ortopedske procedure;
lečenje, ishod
DOI: 10.2298/VSP240329051L

Reference

Abo-Elsoud M, Awad MI, Abdel Karim M, Khaled S, Abdel-moneim M. Internal fixator vs external fixator in the manage-ment of unstable pelvic ring injuries: A prospective compara-tive cohort study. World J Orthop 2023; 14(7): 562–71.

Zhu D, Liu D, Song B, Feng W, Zhang X, Wang Q. Therapeutic effect of an external fixator in the treatment of unstable pel-vic fractures in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2022; 108(6): 103150.

Bagga R, Shetty AP, Kanna RM, Rajasekaran S. INFIX/EXFIX: Innovation managing pelvic fractures in difficult scenarios. J Postgrad Med 2019; 65(3): 177–80.

Bajada S, Mohanty K. Psychometric properties including relia-bility, validity and responsiveness of the Majeed pelvic score in patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain. Eur Spine J 2016; 25(6): 1939–44.

Barrientos-Mendoza C, Brañes J, Wulf R, Kremer A, Barahona M, León S. The role of anterior supra-acetabular external fixator as definitive treatment for anterior ring fixation in unstable pelvic fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48(5): 3737–46.

Berk T, Zderic I, Schwarzenberg P, Halvachizadeh S, Teuben M, Richards G, et al. Cerclage augmentation of S1-S2 transsacral screw fixation in osteoporotic posterior pelvis ring injuries: A biomechanical feasibility study. J Orthop Res 2023; 41(12): 2740–8.

Chen T, Bosscher G, Fox D, Arnoldy C, Bleedorn J. Transarticular elastic external skeletal fixator correction of a stifle rotational deformity and patellar luxation in a dog. Vet Surg 2021; 50(2): 455–63.

Dall BE, Eden SV, Cho W, Karkenny A, Brooks DM, Hayward GM 2nd, et al. Biomechanical analysis of motion following sa-croiliac joint fusion using lateral sacroiliac screws with or without lumbosacral instrumented fusion. Clin Biomech (Bris-tol, Avon) 2019; 68: 182–9.

Hack J, Kranz Y, Knauf T, Bäumlein M, Malcherczyk D, Ruchholtz S, et al. Stability of internal versus external fixation in osteo-porotic pelvic fractures - a biomechanical analysis. Injury 2020; 51(11): 2460–4.

Höch A, Zeidler S, Pieroh P, Josten C, Stuby FM, Herath SC. Trends and efficacy of external emergency stabilization of pel-vic ring fractures: results from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 47(2): 523–31.

Horiguchi A, Ojima K, Shinchi M, Hirano Y, Hamamoto K, Ito K, et al. Usefulness of a high-speed surgical air drill in pubectomy during delayed anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury. Int J Urol 2020; 27(11): 1002–7.

Janati A, Amir-Behghadami M, Arab-Zozani M. Letter to the ed-itor on the article "Cement augmentation of sacroiliac screws in fragility fractures of the pelvic ring-A synopsis and system-atic review of the current literature". Injury 2020; 51(4): 1138–9.

König A, Oberkircher L, Beeres FJP, Babst R, Ruchholtz S, Link BC. Cement augmentation of sacroiliac screws in fragility frac-tures of the pelvic ring-A synopsis and systematic review of the current literature. Injury 2019; 50(8): 1411–7.

Rega PP, Fink B. Optimising pelvic fracture stabilisation in obese victims. BMJ Mil Health 2020; 166(3): 202.

Rommens PM, Graafen M, Arand C, Mehling I, Hofmann A, Wagner D. Minimal-invasive stabilization of anterior pelvic ring fractures with retrograde transpubic screws. Injury 2020; 51(2): 340–6.

Schmal H, Larsen MS, Stuby F, Strohm PC, Reising K, Goodwin Burri K. Effectiveness and complications of primary C-clamp stabilization or external fixation for unstable pelvic fractures. Injury 2019; 50(11): 1959–65.

Stewart RG, Hammer N, Kieser DC. External fixation of unsta-ble pelvic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 2019; 89(9): 1022–7.

Tang J, Shi Z, Hu J, Wu H, Yang C, Le G, et al. Optimal se-quence of surgical procedures for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fracture: A network meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37(4): 571–8.

Tu P, Wang H, Joskowicz L, Chen X. A multi-view interactive virtual-physical registration method for mixed reality based surgical navigation in pelvic and acetabular fracture fixation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2023; 18(9): 1715–24.

Vaidya R, Blue K, Oliphant B, Tonnos F. Combined Pelvic Ring Disruption and Acetabular Fracture: Outcomes Using a Se-quential Reduction Protocol and an Anterior Subcutaneous Pelvic Fixator (INFIX). J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33 Suppl 2: S66–71.

Venayre B, Koyama Y, Kurosawa D, Hammer N, Lingslebe U, Mu-rakami E, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the sacroiliac joint fixation in stress reduction on both sacroiliac joint cartilage and ligaments: A finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bris-tol, Avon) 2021; 85: 105350.

Yimin W, Jingtao L, Lei H, Lihai Z. Analysis and multiple in-dex evaluation of SPO distribution of bone traction needles for pelvic fracture reduction. Med Eng Phys 2023; 119: 104031.