Kako citirati
Sažetak
Uvod: Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je da se analizira povezanost između percepcije učenika osnovnih škola o primeni formativnog ocenjivanja od strane nastavnika fizičkog vaspitanja i nivoa njihove pažnje. Metode: U ovoj deskriptivnoj transverzalnoj studiji, koja je obuhvatila 172 učenika, pažnja je procenjena testom Percepcija sličnosti i razlika, a praksa nastavnika u formativnom ocenjivanju putem upitnika o uspešnosti nastavnika koji je u vezi sa praksom formativnog ocenjivanja i čiji su rezultati validirani. Rezultati: S obzirom na pol, Studentov t-test nije pokazao značajne razlike, osim u broju grešaka u korist dečaka (p < .05). S obzirom na nivo pažnje, nađene su statistički značajne razlike u metakognitivnom (p < .05) i retrospektivnom (p < .05) formativnom ocenjivanju u korist onih sa nižim nivoom pažnje. Međutim, test linearne regresije pokazao je negativnu povezanost između pažnje i metakognitivnog formativnog ocenjivanja (R2 = .28). Zaključak: Može se zaključiti da je niži nivo pažnje izgleda povezan sa povišenom percepcijom učenika osnovnih škola o primeni metakognitivnog ocenjivanja koje je povezano sa internom obradom informacija i sa primenom retroaktivnog ocenjivanja, što je povezano sa pretpostavljenim teškoćama u učenju. Imajući u vidu značaj formativnog ocenjivanja u procesu nastave i učenja, bilo bi preporučljivo da se uključi celokupna obrazovna zajednica, kako bi se podstaklo interesovanje nastavnika, jer ono pruža suštinska znanja u njihovom profesionalnom radu, doprinosi unapređenju akademskog razvoja i sveobuhvatnoj obuci sve dece školskog uzrasta.
Ključne reči
formativno ocenjivanje
deca školskog uzrasta
fizičko vaspitanje
obrazovanje
Reference
Azpilicueta Amorín, M. (2020). Los beneficios de una correcta evaluación formativa en el autoaprendizaje de los alumnos [The benefits of proper formative assessment for students’ self-learning]. Journal of Supranational Policies of Education, 12, 2-25. https://doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2020.12.001
Carrillo-López, P. J. (2022). Escape Room III Coronavirus Covid-19 en escolares de primaria de la isla de Fuerteventura en España [Escape Room III Coronavirus Covid-19 in primary school children on the island of Fuerteventura in Spain]. Revista gestión de las personas y tecnología, 15(43), 43-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.35588/gpt.v15i43.5473
Carrillo-López, P. J., & Hortigüela-Alcalá, D. (2022). Impact of formative assessment on weight status and diet quality in elementary school children. Sportis, 8(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.17979/sportis.2022.8.1.8671
Cerón Urzua, C., Cossio-Bolaños, M. A., Pezoa-Fuentes, P., & Gómez-Campos, R. (2020). Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para evaluar desempeño docente asociado a las prácticas evaluativas formativas [Design and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate teaching performance associated with formative evaluative practices]. Revista Complutense de Educación, 31(4), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.65512
Córdoba Jiménez, T., López Pastor, V. M., & Sebastiani Obrador, E. (2018). ¿Por qué hago evaluación formativa en Educación Física? Relato autobiográfico de un docente [Why do I do formative assessment in Physical Education? A teacher’s autobiographical account]. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 44(2), 21-38. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052018000200021
Crespo-Eguílaz, N., Narbona, J., Peralta, F., & Repáraz, R. (2006). Medida de atención sostenida y del control de la impulsividad en niños: nueva modalidad de aplicación del Test de Percepción de Diferencias “Caras” [Measure of sustained attention and impulsiveness control in children: New way of administering the Faces, Differences Perception Test]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 29(2), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037006776789926
Cumming, G., & Calin-Jageman, R. (2016). Introduction to the new statistics: Estimation, open science, and beyond. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708607
Đurišić, M., & Žunić-Pavlović, V. (2021). Školska klima i adaptivne karakteristike učenika mlađih razreda osnovne škole [School climate and adaptive characteristics of younger primary school students]. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 20(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh20-32979
Gallardo-Fuentes, F., López-Pastor, V., Martínez-Angulo, C., & Carter-Thuillier, B. (2020). Evaluación formativa en educación física y atención a la diversidad [Formative evaluation in physical education and the attention paid to diversity]. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 12(25), 169-186. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m12-25.efef
Gamo, J. R. (2017). Ponencia: El TDAH y la importancia de la respuesta en el entorno José [Lecture: ADHD and the importance of the response in the environment Joseph] [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/fNzjKGRIJt0
González, D. H., Arribas, J. C., & López-Pastor, V. M. (2021). Incidencia de la formación inicial y permanente del profesorado en la aplicación de la evaluación formativa y compartida en educación física [Incidence of pre-service and in-service teacher education in the application of formative and shared assessment in physical education]. Retos, (41), 533-543. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i41.86090
Guzmán-Simón, F., Torres-Gordillo, J. J., & Caballero, K. (2020). Understanding assessment processes for communicative competence through an analysis of teachers’ reported practice. Education Sciences, 10(4), Article 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040116
Hernán, E. J., Pastor, V., & Brunicardi, D. (2019). ¿Por qué hago evaluación formativa y compartida y/o evaluación para el aprendizaje en EF? La influencia de la formación inicial y permanente del profesorado [Why do formative and shared assessment and/or assessment for learning in Physical Education? The influence of initial and in-service teacher education]. Retos, (36), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v36i36.66478
Herranz, M., & López, V. M. (2017). Perspectiva del alumnado sobre su participación en los procesos de evaluación formativa y compartida en educación física en primaria: Un estudio de caso [Students’ perspectives on their participation in formative and shared assessment processes in primary physical education: A case study]. EmásF: Revista Digital de Educación Física, (48), 27-48.
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., García, V., Benito, V., & Villaverde, V. (2016). Influencia del sistema de evaluación empleado en la percepción del alumno sobre su aprendizaje y las competencias docentes [Influence of the assessment system used on students’ perception of their learning and teaching skills]. Revista Infancia, Educación y Aprendizaje, 2(1), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.22370/ieya.2016.2.1.582
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, Á., & Calvo, G. (2019). Pero…¿A qué nos referimos realmente con la evaluación formativa y compartida?: Confusiones habituales y reflexiones prácticas [But what do we really mean by formative and shared evaluation: Common confusions and practical reflections?]. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 12(1), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2019.12.1.001
Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Pérez-Pueyo, A., & Abella, V. (2015). ¿De qué manera se implica el alumnado en el aprendizaje? Análisis de su percepción en procesos de evaluación formativa [How are students involved in learning? Analysis of their perception in formative assessment processes]. Revista de Investigación en Educación, 13(1), 88-104.
Janković-Nikolić, M. D. (2020). Empatija i sistematičnost kod dece predškolskog uzrasta [Empathy and systemizing in preschool children]. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 19(3), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh19-29169
Japundža-Milisavljević, M. M., Đurić-Zdravković, A. A., & Milanović-Dobrota, B. Z. (2022). Stavovi prosvetnih radnika prema inkluziji [Educators’ attitudes towards inclusive education]. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 21(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh21-34279
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a metaanalysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
Kulhavi, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002211
López-Pastor, V. M., Sonlleva, M., & Martínez, S. (2019). Evaluación formativa y compartida en educación [Formative and shared evaluation in education]. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 12(1), 5-9.
López-Pastor, V. M., Molina, M., Pascual, C., & Manrique, J. C. (2020). la importancia de utilizar la evaluación formativa y compartida en la formación inicial del profesorado de educación física: Los proyectos de aprendizaje tutorado como ejemplo de buena práctica [the importance of using formative and shared assessment in initial teacher training in physical education: Mentored learning projects as an example of good practice]. Retos, 37, 630-627. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v37i37.74193
López-Lozano, L., Solís, E., & Azcárate, P. (2018). Evolution of ideas about assessment in science: Incidence of a formative process. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 915-937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9591-1
Molina Soria, M, Pascual Arias, C., & López Pastor, V. M. (2020). El uso de sistemas de evaluación formativa y compartida en las aulas de educación física en educación primaria [The use of formative and shared assessment systems in primary physical education classrooms]. Educación Física y Deporte, 39(1). http://doi.org/10.17533/udea.efyd.v39n1a04
Rosa-Guillamón, A, García-Canto, E., & Carrillo-López, P. J. (2019). Relación entre capacidad aeróbica y el nivel de atención en escolares de primaria [Relationship between aerobic capacity and attention span in primary schoolchildren]. Retos, 35, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v0i35.60729
Rosales, M. (2014). Proceso evaluativo: Evaluación sumativa, evaluación formativa y assesment su impacto en la educación actual [Evaluative process: Summative evaluation, formative evaluation and assessment and their impact on education today]. In Congreso Iberoamericano de Ciencia, Tecnología, Innovación y Educación, 4, Article 662.
Rueda, M. R., Pozuelos, J. P., & Cómbita, L. M. (2015). Cognitive neurosciencie of attention: From brain mechanisms to individual differences in efficiency. AIMS Neuroscience, 2(4), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.4.183
Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., & Montero-García, E. (2015). Metacognition, self-regulation and assessment in problem-solving processes at university. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 107-133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_5
Soria, M., Arias, C., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., & Garcimartín, C. (2022). Análisis de la percepción del alumnado sobre su aprendizaje en sistemas de evaluación compartida [Analysis of students’ perceptions of their learning in shared assessment systems]. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2022.15.1.003%20
Talanquer, V. (2015). La importancia de la evaluación formativa [The importance of formative evaluation]. Educación Química, 26(3), 177-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2015.05.001
Thurstone, L. L., & Yela, M. (2019). Caras-R: Test de percepción de diferencias-revisado: Manual [R-Faces: Difference perception test-revised: Manual]. Tea.
Žunić-Pavlović, V. P., & Pavlović, M. V. (2020). Samoefkasnost i zadovoljstvo poslom nastavnika u školama za učenike sa smetnjama u razvoju [Self-efficacy and job satisfaction of teachers in schools for students with disabilities]. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 19(3), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh19-28267
Politika samoarhiviranja.