Abstract
The integrated curriculum represents a modern approach in the lower grades of elementary school that overcomes traditional disciplinary fragmentation and promotes the holistic development of students of younger school age. The paper analyzes the theoretical foundations, structure and implementation of the integrated curriculum, with a focus on thematic, problematic and project models of integration. The key values of the approach are emphasized - development of personal and social identity, creativity, responsibility, cooperation, autonomy and experiential learning based on constructivist principles and Kolb's experiential learning cycle. The importance of interdisciplinary planning, connecting areas, thematic organization of content, project-oriented activities and the role of the teacher as a facilitator is particularly emphasized. The paper considers the dynamism of planning (from learning outcomes to evaluation), indicators of success and effects on students' motivation, critical thinking and social competence. At the same time, limitations and challenges are pointed out: rigid schedule, priority of traditional subjects, lack of resources, insufficient preparation of teachers, institutional resistance and inequalities in implementation. In conclusion, the integrated curriculum shows a significant potential for improving the quality of education in lower grades, but its effective implementation requires systemic support, continuous professional development of teachers, flexible policies and cooperation with the family and community, thus responding to the requirements of the modern European and national educational context.
Keywords
thematic planning
experimential learning
interdisciplinary integration
holistic development
References
Дедај, М. (2019). Акциона истраживања у функцији рефлексивне праксе васпитача. Синтезе, 8(16), 87-94. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-902X/2019/2217-902X1916087X.pdf
Јелић, М. и Зорић Вучина, М. (2017). Савремене концепције курикулума предшколског васпитања у Црној Гори. Иновације у настави – часопис за савремену наставу, 30(4), 14-34. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0352-2334/2017/0352-23341704014J.pdf
Ковачек-Станић, Г. (2010). Аутономија детета у савременом породичном праву. Зборник радова Правног факултета у Новом Саду, 44(3), 141-162. https://zbornik.pf.uns.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/doi_10.5937_zrpfns44-0048.pdf
Кулић, Р. и Деспотовић, М. (2010). Увод у андрагогију. Београд: Свет књиге.
Маврић, М. (2023). Иинтегрисани курикулум као исход савремених методичких стратегија учења и поучавања васпитача и учитеља првог разреда основне школе у процесу формирања почетних математичких појмова [Докторска дисертација, Департман за Педагошко-психолошке науке Универзитета у Новом Пазару]. Национални репозиторијум дисертација у Србији. https://nardus.mpn.gov.rs/handle/123456789/21513
Маројевић, Ј. (2016). Од епистемологије до скривеног курикулума – критичка vs. банковна педагошка перспектива. Настава и васпитање, 65(1), 125-138. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0547-3330/2016/0547-33301601125M.pdf
Миленовић, Ж. (2013). Наставник у инклузивној настави. Београд: Задужбина Андрејевић.
Миленовић, А. (2017). Разредна настава: иновативни дидактичко-методички модели. Београд: Задужбина Андрејевић.
Миленовић, Ж. (2021). Елементарна дидактика. Лепосавић: Учитељски факултет.
Миленовић, Ж. (2022). Методика васпитно-образовног рада. Лепосавић: Учитељски факултет.
Радовић, В. (2021). Дидактика расуђивања. О развоју наставе и дидактике кроз историју. Београд: Учитељски факултет.
Рајчевић, П. (2017). Демократичност као предуслов испољавања креативности у систему васпитања и образовања. Педагогија, 22(1), 39-47. https://www.forumpedagoga.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Pedagogija%20broj%201%20za%202017.pdf
Рајчевић, П. и Круљ, Ј. (2020). Речник дидактичких појмова. Лепосавић: Учитељски факултет.
Рајчевић, П. (2020). Схватања дидактичара о примени метода наставног рада. Зборник радова Учитељског факултета Призрен – Лепосавић, 14, 215-227. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/1452-9343/2020/1452-93432014215R.pdf
Сучевић, В. и Срдић, В. (2012). Структура новог курикулума у функцији европског концепта квалитетног основног образовања – отварање простора за аутономију школа и наставника. Синтезе, 1(1), 29-49. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-902X/2012/2217-902x1201029S.pdf
Aoki, T., Pinar, W., & Irwin, R. (2004). Curriculum in a New Key. New York: Routledge.
Dardanou, M., & Brito, R. (2024). Family involvement in early childhood education and care: Insights from Portuguese and Norwegian curriculum frameworks. Social Sciences, 13(12), 694. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/12/694
Devi, M. K. K., & Thendral, M. S. (2023). Using Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory to Improve Student Learning in Theory Course. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v37i1/23133
Hughes, S., Russo, J. A., Mansfield, J., Green, A., Jones, D., Vale, C., & Berry, A. (2022). Co-designing integrated mathematics and science lesson learning sequences for primary education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 30(4), 64-76. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/CAL/article/view/15894
Moreira, T., Martins, J., Silva, C., & Berrocal de Luna, E. (2023). Building partnerships in education through a story‑tool based intervention: Parental involvement experiences among families with Roma backgrounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1012568. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1012568/full
Ow-Yeong, Y. K., & Yeter, I. H. (2023). Learning data science in elementary school mathematics: A comparative curriculum analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 8. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40594-023-00397-9
Posner, G. (2004). Analiying the curicculum. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Roeders, P. (2003). Interaktivna nastava. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.
Shaw, J. (2019). Teaching Note-A Call for Including Theories of Evaluation in Program Evaluation Courses Taught in Schools of Social Work. Journal of Social Work Education, 55(3), 596-601. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332391321_Teaching_Note-A_Call_for_Including_Theories_of_Evaluation_in_Program_Evaluation_Courses_Taught_in_Schools_of_Social_Work
Sodergren, C. D., Kettler, T., Sulak, T., & Payne, A. (2023). Teacher Self-Efficacy, Innovativeness, and Preparation to Teach Cross-Curriculum Skills. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(1), 197-209. https://ijcer.net/index.php/pub/article/view/419
Ye, P. & Xu, X. (2023). A case study of interdisciplinary thematic learning curriculum to cultivate 4C skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1080811. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080811/full
Yeter, I. H., Yang, W., & Sturgess, J. B. (2024). Global initiatives and challenges in integrating artificial intelligence literacy in elementary education: Mapping policies and empirical literature. Future in Educational Research, 2(4), 382-402. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fer3.59
Yosepha, A. (2023). Contribution of Project‑based Learning and Integrated Learning to Develop Students’ HOTS. International Conference on Research in Education and Science, 1628-1641. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED654461.pdf
Whitman, G. (2020). A Curricular Critique of School Dress Codes. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 93(2), 72-77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339055039_A_Curricular_Critique_of_School_Dress_Codes
Wieselmann, J. R., Sager, M. T., & Price, B. C. (2022). STEM Project-Based Instruction: An Analysis of Teacher-Developed Integrated STEM PBI Curriculum Units. Education Sciences, 12(9), 626. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/9/626