Sažetak
Glavni cilj ovog referata je nadogradnja klasičnih ekonomskih analiza izbora optimalnog koncepta razvoja malih hidroelektrana. Tehno ekonomski sistem malih hidroelektrana treba da bude socijalno prihvatljivo i skladno uklopljeno u životnu sredinu rešenje. Parametari zaštite životne sredine i socijalni parametri se kvantifikuju Delfi metodom. Rezultat su Studije uticaja na životnu sredinu projekta i Sociološke studije uticaja. Ekološki i sociološki parametri se inkorporiraju u tehno-ekonomske analize optimalnog koncepta razvoja malih hidroelektrana Elektra metodom, kao mogućim višekriterijumskim modelom operacionih istraživanja. Primer, na kome je razvijena metodologija testirana i dokazana, je sistem optimizacije malih hidroelektrana na malim vodotocima u slivnom području Prokletija. Ekonomska cena i ukupne investicije petnaest mogućih malih hidroelektrana su nadograđene sa kvantifikovanim ekološkim i sociološkim parametrima, u funkciji održivog ekonomskog razvoja regiona Prokletije. Glavni doprinos ovog istraživanja je kvantifikovanje socijalnih parametara i parametara zaštite životne sredine i njihovo istovremeno i ravnopravno uključivanje sa tehno ekonomskim parametrima, u matematički model za donošenje odluka, što omogućava održivost.
Reference
Arondel, C., & Giradin, P. (2000). ‘Sorting cropping systems on the basis of their impact on ground water quality. European Journal of Operational Research, 127(3), 467-482.
Babel, M.S., Das Gupta, D.A., & Nayak, D.K. (2005). A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour Manage, 19, 693-712. doi:10.1007/s11269-005-3282-4
Barelli, L., Liucci, L., Ottaviano, A., & Valigi, D. (2013). Mini-hydro: A design approach in case of torrential rivers. Energy, 58, 695-706. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.06.038
Triantaphyllou, E. (2000). Multi-criteria decision making methods a comperative study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chung, E., & Seong, L.K. (2009). Identification of Spatial Ranking of Hydrological Vulnerability Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques: Case Study of Korea. Water Resources Management, 23(12), 2395-2416.
Gupta, R., Kewalramani, M.A., & Ralegaonkar, R.V. (2003). Environmental Impact Analysis Using Fuzzy Relation for Landfill Siting. Journal of Urban Planning & Development, 129(3), 121-139. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488
Hanley, N., Shogren, J.F., & White, B. (2002). Environmental economics in theory and practice. Houndmills Hampshire UK and New York: Palprave-Macmillan.
Just, R.E., & Netanyahu, S. (1998). Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Raju, S.K., Duckstein, L., & Arondel, C. (2000).
Multicriterion Analysis for Sustainable Water Resources Planning: A Case Study in Spain. Water Resources Management, 14(6), 435-456. doi:10.1023/A:1011120513259
Escobar, M.T., & Moreno-Jimenez, J.M. (2002). A linkage between the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Compromise Programming Models. Omega, 30(5), 359-365. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00053-1
Mihajlović, I. (2010). Statistical modelling in ecological management using the artificial neural networks (ANNs). Serbian Journal of Management, 5(1), 39-50.
Milosevic, H. (2013). Model of incompressible viscous fluid flow driven by pressure difference in a given channel.International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 62(C), 242-246. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.02.059
Mousseau, V., Slowinski, R., & Zielniewicz, P. (1999). ‘ELECTRE: Methodological guide and user's manual', Cahier du LAMSADE. France: Universite de Paris Dauphine.
Opricovic, S. (2009). A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning. Water Resour Manage, 23, 1549-1561. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9340-y
Opricović, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res , 156(2), 445-455. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res ,178(2), 514-529. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.01.020
Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria decision - aid. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Perace, C., Palmer, C., & Perace, D. (2002). Valuing the environment in developing countries. Chaltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Raju, K.S., & Duckstein, L. (2004). Integrated application of cluster and multicriterion analysis for ranking water resources planning strategies: a case study in Spain. J Hydroinformatics, 6, 295-307.
Rogers, M., Bruen, M., & Maystre, L.Y. (2000). ELECTRE and decision support methods and applications in engineering and infrastructure investment. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Russell, S.O., & Campbell, P.F. (1996). Reservoir Operating Rules with Fuzzy Programming. Journal of Water Resources Planning & Management, 122(3), 165-171.
Shim, J.P., Warkentin, M., Courtney, J.F., Power, D.J., Ramesh, S., & Carlsson, C. (2002). Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support System, 33, 111-126.
S.H.Jalali, (2012). Environmental Determinants, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Export Performance: Empirical Evidence from Iran. Serbian Journal of Management, 7(2), 245-255. doi:10.5937/sjm7-1687
Stevovic, S., & Stefanović, D. (2008). Selection of the technical optimum for the purpose of environmental quality preservation by Delphy method. Tehnika-Our civil engineering, 27-34.